One thing they are looking at is....
• Reconciliation of the petrophysical model, and the apparent in-situ hydrocarbons, with the
hydrocarbons recovered to surface to date.
Why would they be checking to see if the hydrocarbons match up with the data they have, when these hydrocarbons are from the same reservoir as the Ice1 hydrocarbons recovered.
Maybe I'm not understanding, but as a layman it's a little concerning.
Could a mistake have been made, or is it possible for hydrocarbons to differ from one another, even ones within the same reservoir and recovered just metres apart?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.35%) |
Mkt cap ! $25.46M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.3¢ | 2.3¢ | 2.2¢ | $12.51K | 550.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | 2065804 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3¢ | 156000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| 88E (ASX) Chart |