I too watched with interest
And to me the question that needed asking in the context of the doco and the round table discussion was - Why wasnt exactly the same sort of critical review and debate held over Al Gore's doco???
Much was made by the presenter of the errors in Durkins film yet the myriad of errors and falsehoods in Gore's film were totally ignored
That was the point of the doco - why is only one side of the debate truely heard?
