The theory, of Dr Vagif Soultonov and others, behind most 'drugs', that they cause liver damage is valid after 75 years of research, and only confirms my belief in SLA, and future prospects are immeasurable with our limited understanding of what they have behind closed doors.
Just because it isn't hitting the news wires 'big time' yet, means nothing bar scepticism; and the fact one sceptic, a professor, at Melbourne's Swinbourne University, has already been 'turned' suggests a likely outcome favouring drugs similar to SLA's has only made investors more acute to the potential benefits of such medications.
Research how much it costs to get a pharmaceutical, such as Ropren, approved and you may just see the value in it and others, some have and have been blowing SLA off to accumulate at a lower price.....possibly true due to the lack of sensible posts on SLA lately IMO.....have you accumulated enough?....or any at all?
DYOR and enjoy the ride on BIO techs....the future of medicine is finally being realised for what it is.
Even Pheizer are investing huge sums into biotechs since the problems with 'chemical' drugs are so vast and unpredictable over periods of time.....many have been proven to have disastrous effects....
It's all just my opinion, and I'm entitled to one, but there's more to Bio techs than meets the eye.....IMO
Consider the environmental factors too.....most biotechs use plant material to solve health problems....the more plants the less CO2 (carbon credits???)....and natural remedies have worked for thousands of years.....it's no wonder BIO techs are becoming the flavour of 2007.
Be healthy in 2008......and not just with SLA....
SLA Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)