The order flow clearly shows the majority of trades came 'at maket' ... ie : orders shown in level 2 data (depth of field) had no significance on what actually transpired
Which is exactly what I have commented on ... the value of relying on 'depth' to Prove sentiment in the market at a particular point in time is BS.
The Salient point you don't seem to be able to acknowledge is
the level 2 data (depth) showed sellers out numbered buyer in the days prior to this up move ... If the depth actually had value as to an upcoming trend or sentiment , the data prior would have shown buyers out numbering sellers, but it did not, the sp took off ..... how.? Not off the screen orders but 'at market'
So I am questioning why on earth anyone would belive the depth is an accurate litmus test now ?
As for " Movers and shakers my @rse"
I take it by that remark, you (and obviously mcfj) belive that the depth is an investor/traders gospel.... ... that is sad the hear
Ps: buggered if know why you guys have taken such an agro stance on a debate about market data Depth ..... my opinion on it, even though I used the avq order flow for example, clearly is market wide not company specific.
- Forums
- ASX - Short Term Trading
- AVQ
- could run quickly
could run quickly, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVQ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online