Apparently those were the "good old days of pure morality" and since then, the non-superstition has "eroded" society.
Maybe we should also consider Cory Bernadi theory about his extrapolation of no shame to bestiality .
I'm starting to think that he has a valid point!
Pro-gay's -another high jacked word- claim that animals can't verbalise to agreement to sex.
What is the arguments of the pro-SSM advocates for mute heterosexual couples who can't verbalise their consent?
Normally in a such a loving situation you don't have the chance to write down your response, it just a reaction of both parties.
Be careful how you try to respond to this question as I'm trying to trap you into a net . Be forewarned!
