Ann: New Investor Communication va Webcast, page-21

personally,

I really don't think that we should put Dirk on the spot for the past --- he wasn't the authority and I really don't think he should have to even justify by seemingly to carry the can.


surely it's far far far more important to know what he wants to do, where we actually are and where we are going.


to me - the past is the past - there is one person only who should now be held accountable for that past - that is Gavin Rezos

the man, who as Executive Chairman on a huge rem. told us that he was across day to day matters and worked on long term strategy -

he wore the hat and carried accountability for last years comms --

where we know that they were sprouting weeks out that the full year would produce 18 million US --

now, under Gavins watch ------- either in that soon a period before the end of the year - either the business was in negotiations for a licence or larger deal to get us to the 18 million -

in which case we should have been in trading halt and suspension - OR, we were nowhere near it --

in which case he as the overseeing chairman that he says he was - should have informed the market ---------------- end of story.

We get to hear Gavin at the AGM - if he cares to explain himself without attacking the people who trusted him and he failed.


I really don't see how Dirk should be lumbered with that crap.

Lets see how he is putting his stamp on it -- and, perhaps get a look at some of the other team as well.

Those who were not at the Sydney meeting will now get a look at Dirk and perhaps someone else in the team and you can judge for yourselves.

have a great day all

Pinto