I really find there are intertesting issues in the SLA realm (and I imagine similarly across HC). First of all, I have a small amount of shares in BPO, not SLA and have just been watching SLA with interest for many months due to the Farmin.
Whilst I can symphathise with both sides of this ongoing downramping debate, I find it extremely bizarre that holders of ASX listed companies are not open to negative factors that companies face. Do they assume that there company is not going to face any obstacles in approvals? Is it just a matter of move forward with no hurdles? It seems many posters here are blinded by the desire for the company to perform. What about the uprampers (many posters here could be guilty of this), should they be held responsible for inflating the company?
I agree, that there is no place for downrampers, but people whom post topical subjective material should be encouraged and it provides a great resource for these forums. Any prospective investor should use the forums as 'a' resource not the 'only' resource tool.
Again, I am not a holder of the company, nor do I know the facts nor have an opinion on the direction of the company. I am just interested in some of the 'one sided' debate that occurs on HC.
SLA Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)