SOR & WBT comparison, page-31

"Hahaha no one is arguing the scalability"
FireEmperor,ROFLMAO, yes yes , after all other companies have already achieved 40nm
ReRAM.
"it's the other metrics you should be worried about"
Surandy70 has already set you straight on those metrics, maybe that's why he has shares
in SOR but not WBT.
Let's wait till WBT achieve a working 40nm ReRAM ,then we can compare it to SORs
flexible transparent 10nm and under ReRAM again.
Weebit Nano Ltd (ASX: WBT), targeting 300nm Kilo Bit Array and 40nm cells in parallel.
The first critical milestone is the 300nm1 Kilo Bit Array. This milestone will significantly
mitigate the development risk associated with reaching the 40nm ReRAM Silicon Oxide
working cell target by the end of 2017.

SORs 2015 the old prototype , wonder how the new improved one is going.

The nanocube memory cells are 10,000x smaller than a human hair.
Conceptually two trillion nanocubes could fit on a postage stamp sized area. If one
nanocube holds one byte of data, this would equal two terabytes of data.
Significantly, the nanocubes have potential to be stacked in layers multiplying the amount
of potential data storage with each additional layer.
Testing has proven that data can be reliably stored in and retrieved from the nanocube
memory cells. Accurately repeating this over 200,000 times in testing also proved
exceptional reliability.

Strategic Elements Managing Director Charles Murphy said, It is accepted
that current Flash technology can’t keep up.
The nanocube technology is absolutely cutting edge and has the potential to
revolutionise how data is stored and used. It’s being developed to enable
more data to be used faster, in much less space at less cost”.
........................................................................................................
Cheers.