So we need then keep trashing marriage even if in your view it has been trashed that the last ones who haven't trashed it shouldn't be saved under the vows they took?
Choose a different name for it for it and a different definition then !
Is that whats coming from ssm debate the right to pick and choose the language and no right to protect the language ?
Just how many people in Australia have taken their vows as a man and a woman?
And compare it to those who want the same right to trash it from those vows then use the right to say it has been trashed by heterosexuals !
In fact i would say they have more right to trash it than a ssm advocate because that is what the me campaign is becoming more each day imo.
The right to trash any differing view but not a right to say no and without the years of an institution to even garner an ability to even judge how it would work .
Other than the fact society has rejected it for an eternity as far as im aware.
Choose another name for it . It maybe even on the future that is what they want they simple want trash everything to say ive come out of the closet look at me look at me .
Truly a disgusting regard for marriage as an institution that has stood time as a celebration between two couples of the opposite sex .
Change of language is simple but no they want the word and for me that is enough to vote no .
They bring nothing for an improvement to the table on marriage and is another reason to vote against change as it brings no improvement to current marriage equality in heterosexual marriage even!
They dont want bring something new they want trash it first and the first part is changing the language and they dont want to .
