pintohoo i think most people would not deny any couples the right to be together - SSM if it was only SSM would most likely get up
Trouble is SSM is a package and we do not yet understand the ramifications of that package - this has been rushed into with damn all research .
I have seen posters put up at Melbourne University outlining diversity " not gender , not race , not religion and not age "
each item had a diagram , man with man , woman with woman , black with white etc - the "AGE" diagram had a male with a female , male 36 years old - female 10 years old
and you think there is not a problem - part of their agenda is to totally break down family and the family unit - they may be a radical part of the SSM movement but the radicals are the ones getting everything their own way - others have to back down or risk the curse of retribution from political correct speech
We are jumping into something akin to a massive mine field with a blind fold on
- Forums
- Breaking News
- Worker fired for supporting 'no'.
Worker fired for supporting 'no'., page-77
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online