loses biggest customer: gaol , page-4

Hopefully to unify a number of threads.

I've been doing my cyberspace thing openly since 1996, during which time I've acquired a legion of enemies who resort to lies and other despicable stunts to stop me. Typically I let them dig deeper holes for themselves, so that by the end they end up discredited for life.

Now don't you think any bum from this bitter brigade would jump at any chance to expose me for any improper share disclosure? So Liam don't waste my time.

HillDweller you are welcome to trawl through my history for any evidence that I bought IAS shares - let alone @$2. until you can find something all will condemn you as one more dill who doesn't think twice about lying, and so can be never be believed about anything.

Back to IAS. I was unaware of this new item, but it is a second bombshell which shows that without these 2 big losers IAS would have continued itself making losses from inception.

The nature of their business is that they know their gross profit to the minute, hence there is a tremendous potential for illegal insider trading.

Don't you think that any insiders who got on early, also knew when the game was up, well before IAS gets around to public disclosure? Wouldn't they be trying to find buyers they can dump to? Wouldn't posting ebullient promotions here be a great way to con buyers?