interesting, page-14

I would find it more puzzling if negative posters owned the stock.

Personally I have never been burnt by QTK, in fact I traded it a couple of times before its new identity and once around the 20c mark.

My interest in QTK is from a psychological perspective. I find it incredulous that a company like this is allowed to even trade. When you look at the crux of it, if QTK were not a tradeable stock but a different entity they would have probably been sued and criminal charges laid. It's basically white collar crime in my view.

Anyway back to the psychology. It is fascinating to see how companies like this go about their business, and how they use announcements and the Internet to push their goals. Also the psychology of investors who are caught in the hype, and how they react and concede and eventually turn on the company.

There are a number of companies on the ASX that follow the same sort of philosophy, they really are relatively easy to pick. My favourites in the past have been WSG/MUL(NWT)/LUM/BRO/QTK and my latest darling is GPN.

You won't keep me away from the on-going saga for quids. The material is too good to ignore and is also a valuable lesson in investing.