Mate, I can see you're lost, or missing the point entirely. But I'll describe the principle in a simpler manner:
(i) Something was falling short of expert theoretical prediction or generally held truth.
(ii) Experts, believing their theory to be infallible (because they're experts) and the truth to be the truth, simply had to come up with an explanation for the shortfall.
(iii) Never mind that the explanation, given adamantly, was unsubstantiated; this would be sufficient enough for these experts to show the theory still held true.
(iv) Even a simple, honest "We just can't explain it - maybe, just maybe, our theory is wrong" from these experts at the time would never suffice.
This exact scenario happened in the past. Scholars, studying meticulous records of flooding of the Nile that the ancient Egyptians kept, could never understand why there was nothing special in the water level readings taken around the time of the Great Flood, as they had read in the Bible. And of course, everyone knew Noah's flood to be the truth.
So the scholars' only conclusion: The Egyptians must have lied.
Mate, the parallels between the "expert" Egyptian scholars with their claim of "missing flood water", and the "expert" climate scientists with their claim of "missing heat" should now be obvious to you.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Climate records tumble again
Climate records tumble again, page-92
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
WCE
WEST COAST SILVER LIMITED
Bruce Garlick, Executive Chairman
Bruce Garlick
Executive Chairman
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online