EDIT, in reference to your post
27763266
..................
You have used alternative data to the IPCC. They have categorically shown data as well as other data that also compliments the data from D.O.E at the U.S as per previous post I did.
Along with many many historical observations. The point is that the Arctic does experience cycles and observations have shown that. Unlike your guesstimate from pretend ships that managed to get data from the apparent frozen arctic.
Not unusual for a cycle to not show a trend mjp. Dont be shocked. one up and one down.
As for the Arctic it is showing signs of recovery. Maisie data and Greenland data are showing a large rebound. This nonsense of 8th lowest is meant for the sheep who would not like to hear that the Arctic is showing signs of a reverse trend.
A real shame that the church are changing their presentation format and baselines to fool you sheep!
Spencer
You can dispute the NASA Excellence award winner in Roy Spencer and his assessment of the Arctic Oscillation with his reference to the peer reviewed paper. Fine do that dispute his assessment.
