Who are these "future" groups?
You're so hyped on this topic, that you missed the groups that I mentioned in my previous post.
The tampering with the current definition of the marriage act will be enough justification for it to be redefined possibly again in the future.
You want equality under a "different act" - in other words to offer "pretend marriage" to SS couples.
Why not!
As I've said, social groups are ascribed certain labels due to their life style choices - hippies, bikies etc
The word 'marriage' has been set aside for one particular group, 'de facto for anther group.
Maybe an 'entwined union' is an apt title for a SS couple.
These groups had a legitimate right to seek change and the community agreed, and tokenism would not have been fair or just.
Yes, they do have right to seek change!
But a sensible Govt. would try to appease both side of the debate by creating a seperate Act, bearing in-mind not to offend by avoiding using wording associated with heterosexual couples.
