We are talking about MARRIAGE equality - not equality generally,
You said you supported MARRIAGE equality - but it's clear you do not as you offer tokenism as a solution, not equality. I would rather you are transparent than debate semantics.
History has proven older lobbyists are alarmist and wrong - as we have seen with failed doomsday predictions in past debates on Oral Contraception, No fault divorce, Abortion, the Vote for Women, Aboriginals - do I need to go on.
Clearly you have no interest in SS equality, and your point that the heterosexual community should have the right to be LEGALLY and LEGISLATIVELY disassociated from the SS Community, just exposes your true prejudice.
So sadly you have exposed yourself a just another NO voter offering no substantive insight on why people should vote NO, save for a trenchant dislike of the SS community.
I wish I could find someone on your side who had something truly constructive to offer the NO debate.
