shares v options, page-6

Without naming names, as its a waste of time and will no doubt flair up WW3, alot of people here could be accused a being downrampers. I honestly can't understand why somebody would spend as much time as some do on a stock they don't hold/like.

If some off the people in here actually had some real experience in managing companies or professional investment banking experience (not talking about being a broker), you would realise that the past months arguments of dilution aare nonsense.

Firstly, their is no use issuing yourself countless millions of share over an above the ten of millions you already have. The paper becomes worthless, you can't trade it and it actually harms you in selling what you already had.

I'd explain further but if you need clarification please raise your hand, I'm happy to continue.

I'm glad these deals for extra tenements have been done via script. If as you guy say, these directors are crooks and control the majority wouldn't they pay for the tenements via cash just raised from the IPO? That's what a real crook would do wouldn't they? Not issue themselves stock or their partners in a company that they already have plenty.

I for one can see much more profitable scenario playing out here.

Now over to you guys.