I may just send the Bill to Flannery, page-43

When "the science" can explain the warming from 1910 to 1940 and the subsequent cooling from 1950 to 1980 I'll listen to it.

And when "the science' can explain why the hundreds of climate models don't match reality then I'll listen.

While "the scientists" can't adequately explain why "hiding the decline" and "using Mike's Nature trick" are necessary to tamper with the climate data I'll consider their science to be as fake as a fake thing can be.

And when they can explain why Michael Mann's Hockey Schtick has been hidden away as an embarrassment to "the science" and scientific method I'll take the clowns seriously.


Until then - climate science is just plain old garbage tied up with jargon protected by over-defensive zealots.