Is the honeymoon over?, page-51

With all due respect, I've been here since 2015 and watched it all, the "spruiking"so to speak came from one person only; NC who dominated the entire message of the company. The board had nothing to do with it, they were, we assume, doing their job and lobbying in Washington.
Trying to lay blame with the board now is contrary to the actual facts and events.

NC in the midst of it all had a major catastrophic family event in his life , there is a human dimension here not discussed.
Leading up to and after that event the messages he sent out became impulsive, very strange and mixed, the board says he retired for health reasons, read what you may into that. I met him in Perth and was really surprised at the time how happy and smiling he was, considering, it was only later on reflection I realised it was sever over compensation for trauma. He was traumatised, of that I am certain.

I note that now, cleverly, the company message is always fronted by the top 3 Hyning, Kretch and Brookins. No one individual is pushing a singular communication. Lesson learnt I would say.

And further I would suggest, if there were even the remote possibility of fabricating the message to shareholders, collusion of three would be impossible. Very clever strategy to set the boat back on a level keel. imnsho.