I did think it was a bit bizarre, given it'd be much more beneficial for the company to have cash/liquid assets to convert to cash.
But I can only go off what's stated (I think I might ask the question to confirm).
My maths is correct if it's true though ;p.
Definately poorly worded if it isn't the case.... "shareholders" shouldn't be in there.
But the poor wording is by TAW management, not ours.
Cheyne.
Ann: TAW: Tawana increases Cowan Lithium Project area, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
