asylum seekers cost what a joke, page-17

  1. 1,458 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 23
    I always pose the question, why is it only North America
    Europe and ANZ who bear the brunt of paying to protect
    the world's refugees. Japan is one of the richest countries in the world but try getting them to take any.
    What about the oil rich midle-eastern countries- surely
    they can afford to take some and some would be more
    culturally happy there.
    The government , judging by it's actions, doesn't feel
    happy with the burden of asylum seekers and the
    electorate, judging by the last election, in the main seems to agree with them.
    So why not just come out of the treaties that we
    have signed and be on the same level as Japan etc.
    We could still grant ad hoc asylum depending on
    circumstances but we wouldn't need to clog our
    courts up with people appealing as a means of staying
    deportation(apparently most cases are decided in
    3 months, it's the appeals that take the time).
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.