Not that i was looking to challenge, but there is a gap in your numbers.
If the road/power are to cost $345m, and the 40% share of the total CAPEX is $260m, doesn't this mean the an additional $85m will have to be funded by shareholders?
This split would also push the CAPEX up to $390m as a "goal seek" number.
I fully understand that it's super early stages and this is a back of the envelope calculation, but the reality is that this calc is flawed.
It would mean Mano picks up $390m + $85m JV Partner shortfall; coming to $475m CAPEX bill that goes on top of the bidders price.
So the current AVZ m/cap is $446m for just the 60% and then the buyer needs to fork out another $475m.
So if i wanted to extract lithium out of this puppy it would cost me $921m just to buy the 60% ASX listed bits.
Yeah?
Or have i calced this incorrectly?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Ann: Manono Project Update
Ann: Manono Project Update, page-127
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online