Yes, he came away in a slightly more positive light than he did when debating with kids in the first video presented.
Ironically the reason, I believe, is that the 18 year old didn't let Frank get away with his leading assumptions. In my view the 18 year old ran rings round Frank in terms of depth and breadth of his contributions.
I would say that the young fellow has ten years of life experience in one year whereas Frank has one year of experience repeated ten times in ten years.
