Carbon to zinc ratio must be quite high, going on 50%. NCZ will say that the high amount of tails is due to the high original throughput, and this is somewhat true. But another big driver for the original poor recovery was a problematic carbon content. Interesting that there has been no mention of the high C:Zn ratio in either the met test announcement or this feasibility announcement from NCZ.
NCZ has got a good zinc story to sell, but its interesting that such a material piece of information has not, at the very least, been debunked by NCZ management?
It was a problem the first time. Will it be an even bigger problem this time around?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NCZ
- Ann: Outstanding Feasibility Results for Century Mine restart
Ann: Outstanding Feasibility Results for Century Mine restart, page-35
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NCZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LGP
LITTLE GREEN PHARMA LTD
Paul Long, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Long
Chief Executive Officer
SPONSORED BY The Market Online