ukraine expectations and time to call it, page-3

SP3

I came to the realisation that the issue here isnt 'how big' the deposits are here........but how small they are!

Say what Satori!?

They are profitable as they are....regardless of 'size'

You can betcha that Uran will extend any inferred resource...its 2007 now...not 20 years ago using old technology.

Good things are ahead.

Uran are targetting 'small to medium' projects .......and they would be doing that with the intention of making them BIGGER. They will.

John Borshoffs database (lets assume they have had a look at it eh?) would have these projects listed and with them the probable upsides of further exploration.

Lets get one thing straight though? Calls of Uran is cheap is like saying water is wet.

Hunleys 2 years ago said any Uranium company around 100 million Market cap would need to have real projects on board to justify those valuations. Uranium at the time was around $30 a pound.

Uran is 15 million!!!! With half a dozen countries in various stages of negotiations. Uranium is $85 a pound.

Think about it?

Uran and Kate Hobbs are so smug and insular in their little world of non disclosure...licking their lips in waiting.

NEVER have they called Ukraine anything else but a go ahead project.
They knew in 2006....2008 is approaching.

Ive been tentative for the best part of the last 6 months.

No longer.

Whether its another week month or 3 months we will be acquiring projects.

The value to the share price at the current market cap is self explanatory.