stuffed, page-22

Stand by my post that the original post was a mischievous attempt to stir the pot with an irrelevant history of unethical conduct by SWC directors.

I expected your response and that it would expand on the actual mechanism of Views formation (I was not privy to this). Whether beginning from a shelf company or via the receivers is beside the point as there is now a new business, new constitution and articles, new directors, management and new major shareholders.

No retraction - No apology - My point stands

It was a poor attempt to tarnish current management by implication. Shame Shame Shame