You should cut the respondents some slack. As it turns out, the poster's question may be a genuine one, but he posed it as if equatorial regulation is an issue, which to date it has not been. If you have been paying attention to SAS threads these last couple of weeks you will notice the spamming of several trolls asking stupid questions (or, at least questions to which either there is no answer, or the answer is a non-issue, or they have been given the answer and ignored it), and the poster's inquiry pretty closely matches the m.o. of those trolls.
The poster did not link any relevant info on regulation as an issue for SAS, only as a general issue. In order to be separated from the trolls (and the respondents' justified treatment of them) it would be a better idea to provide links to actual problems, rather than cutting and pasting generalistic quotes without a source and a tie-in for SAS.
Adding to the questionable nature of the poster's enquiry - at least for me - was that he stated as fact something which I do not personally believe is accurate. I haven't seen a link yet confirming my recall that the north-south orbit was just where the Indian rocket was going, but I've had it confirmed from recall which is a lot closer than the poster's position which flew in the face of current popular opinion and was not substantiated with a link.
A long way of saying don't be too harsh on the natives
SAS Price at posting:
18.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
