Denman says:
"Are greenhousers simply believing that climate should
be constant and any change can only mean
humanity is sinfully responsible?"
No. Climate scientists have evidence that digging up
carbon desposited when dinosaurs roamed the earth
and bunring it has increased the probabilty (as we've
cleared much of the world's forests) of a return to
a violent dinosaur-era climate - but mercifully
minus huge carniverous dinosaurs!
The worst part of what is going to happen
(unless we work like crazy to reduce our
output of CO2) is not meaner droughts
and meaner cyclones, it's an ever
accelerating rate of ice-cap and
glacial meltdowns as the area
of heat-reflecting white
diminishes and the area
of heat-absobring dark
colours creates an
even faster rise
in global temps
than even the
most gung-ho
scientists had
predicted!
If you're standing in a paddock being
charged by a carzy bull, that is not
the time to use your pocket
calcuator to evaluate the
best fence to run towards
(the closer uphill fence
of the further-away
downhill fence) and
phone a fence advisor
on your mobile for a
chat about fence
options.
If you're standing in a paddock being
charged by a crazy bull, pick any
fence and RUN LIKE HELL and
hope you can jump over it
before the bull gores
you in the backside.
This not the time for twee middle-class
discussions about does climate
change really exist - or is it
a plot by pinko-scum
radicals who hate
capitalism?
Just about all climate scientists have evidence
that backs up the therory that it does exist
and it was mostly caused by humans
and that if we dramtically reduce
our rate of CO2 emissions we may
eventually be able to stop
the crazy bull before he
gores our only habitat
into a state not fit
for human life
as we know it.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- two views oncerning climate change
two views oncerning climate change, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)