HotCopper Credibility in question, page-8

Yep. Completely missed my point!
Interpretation implies there is something/data to interpret.
Now I'm pretty sure ( and I just bet 10 bucks with my colleague that you'll disagree ) that hot air doesn't qualify as "data".
I was hoping for something a bit more, robust or substantial than "Twitter" for ASX Stocks. FFS.
Thanks for the grammatical correction by the way. You must be incredibly busy over there at the society of pedants.
To be clear; I don't care if this stock is talked up or down. Talk it down to 0.50 if they like. I would still double my dough and go buy a yacht.

And FYI. Your posting history is no oil painting either my friend.
Plenty of one and two liners. You can do better than that!
After you spell check the above for me, please feel free to have the last word.
I'm all done.