AFR another, page-80

That was the point about the AFR articles I was trying to make in previous posts, but the vitriole and unprecedented fury being vented by non-holders shouted me down and told me I was taking this personally.

One article by the AFR would have been sufficient to alert people to inconsistencies in reporting by GSW, which is what this appears to be. At this point there is no proof of deliberate fraud on the part of GSW. Three articles with no new news was an attack.

The last article was pure dislike and cutting down the tall poppy and it occurred to me the thing that seemed to get reporters (and both named and unnamed sources) angry was based on the fact that GSW so easily moved into the US market and that Fidelity bought into them, topping up their coffers and giving them the chance to move ahead with their sales and implementations much more easily than most Australian tech companies have it.

I'm not upset that this forum attracted so many trolls and baiters - haters will hate, they don't even have to have a reason to do so. I've read enough from them, now I glance at the position and if I see "Sell" and "Not Held" I don't bother to read anymore. They've made their point and gone way beyond into upsetting and taunting holders for no reason except their own entertainment.