LIT Chart Vs LPD Chart, page-40

How about looking at realistic comparisons of resource types?

Comparisons between LIT and LPD is statistically a problem, as they are different companies with different technologies and resources under development.

Try comparing Bacanora Minerals to LIT, as the have similar types of resources in adjacent projects to each other in Both Mexico and Germany. This makes LIT undervalued.

Plus if no holders or LPD holders insist LPD is performing better, then LIT Must be UNDERVALUED .

Am I missing something? I expect the critical reviews now, with an explanation of how LIT is not interpreted to be undervalued.

Critics can not have it both ways. If they deny LIT is undervalued and can not accept another competitor might be overvalued in the comparison, then they may have to consider using Bacanora Minerals as a benchmark for constructive comparison of similar resources and geography.

I find very little criticism of Bacanora Mineral’s projects. It is all relative to the scope of comparisons.