How's this for a theory??, page-89

>We are forced to put our 10% annual contribution for the stated scenario to happen is unacceptable.

Your employer is forced to make the 10% contribution, this money has never been available to the employee.

>erodes the wealth over the years

The major erosion of wealth in the super industry are flat fee's on small accounts, this is a different argument.

Superfund's are inherently extremely conservative, returns of 7% are f*ing great in a historical context and even better when you consider current bond rates. It is because of this conservative that lending the shares you have gone long on offers greater return. Super funds shouldn't be picking highs and lows they should be buying and holding for long periods. Loaning these shares will generate additional revenue for the super fund.

>Then they use shares bought by Australian's money to hose everyday investors, just like this current Lithium attack.

They pay the super fund to short the shares to hose people who haven't done their homework, just like this current lithium attack.

Look Around the Poker Table; If You Can’t See the Sucker, You’re It.