It's actually Worley, not Warsley. They have 23,800 personel and Neptune has a little over 500. It's a long bow to draw comparisons. I'm beginning to think that NMS could easily slip (or be manipulated) back below $1 for the sake of the possible placement and next acquisition(s). Lange, at AGM, clearly stated that future acquisitions were a priority, but certainly didn't elaborate. If NMS began to swing large deals with the likes of BP, Esso or BHP or even new contracts with Apache or Cal Dive before future acquisitions, can/would this information be suppressed from public notice for the sake of keeping the SP low? Don't get me wrong, as a share holder i'm more than happy to be kept in the dark for the sake of 'genuine' future sp increase.
NMS Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
