@kane93
he's not wrong per se.
but what he's attempting to do is apply fundamental (ie historic data) analysis to non fundamentally driven stocks.
the problem is that - if one were to follow his methodology to its logical conclusion none of the 3 stocks are worth anything but their cash holdings .
BIQ next quarter expects to lose $4m for eg. BTH $3m.
all 3 stocks appear to have their equity valued as is purely because investors belive they will reach cashflow positive sometime in the next 12-24 months - and be aggressively cashflow positive once they hit that inflection point
So once you isolate that - the only useful benchmark for comparison of the stocks is their forecast future revenues over the relevant EV
If a seriously risk off market breaks out all of them will trade lower - because they are spec risk stocks
But thats share price.
In terms of fundamental earnings outlook all 3 put you in the same position - one must go by company projections to value future earnings to assess the risk/reward profile of the stock
So then all 3 pivot on 'trust'. Except its not trust per se - its legally binding/actionable market disclosures
Other than that its simply a subjective assessment
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BUD
- Ann: Response to ASX Aware Letter
Ann: Response to ASX Aware Letter, page-203
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BUD (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LGP
LITTLE GREEN PHARMA LTD
Paul Long, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Long
Chief Executive Officer
SPONSORED BY The Market Online