Ann: Company Response to EGM Notice Issued by Alan Beasley, page-14

Have to agree the rebuttal is pretty weak.

And some lines are damage control indicating some truth to beasley s allegations.

Hudson connection to rent and past relationship and departure of mutton is worrying.

Maybe beasleys has no choice but keep it separate to ensure he wins this battle even though this inccurs extra costs.

Thc was in sales under beasleys chairmanship but was that beasleys fault?

It has to be very serious that beasley is putting his reputation in this counter coup.

Im not sure why somebody would do that foe the sake of it.

Also his alliance with xu. Xu seems to have a good record and professional background.

Are those 2 rogues or are they trying to keep this moving and ambitiously moving forward? Both having a finance / m&a background?

If this was old school vs new school as the only thing i knee. Id score it beasleys. I want the younger hungrier guys.

If it's bankers investors vs. Lawyers. Id take bankers investors. (And i dont rate bankers that much).

If it was offensive and first mover vs defender. Id choose the offender.

If it's who s taking a risk vs. Who isn't. Id give an edge to the side taking the risk.

Beasleys side looks more professional.

It makes no sense for somebody smart to let his ego drive this.

If I look at everything else I feel beasleys side is the one for growth.

Absolute dogs breakfast.

As a medium sized shareholder.my vote are beasleys so far. My gut feel.

And xu 6% why risk that?

Not happy though. Hope we can get some more info.