Ann: Response to ASX Query, page-245

  1. 124 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 20
    Bettt et al on this forum espousing the imminent takeover that's going to burn the shorts - which by the way I understand are at the margin versus the free float here - I am sorry but IMO politely you are sadly mistaken if you think there's a get out of jail free card being handed out here in the form of a takeover anywhere even near the last traded GSW price on the ASX.

    I say this having some real life experience in M&A (~20 years) at the coal face and also specifically within the tech space.

    I may share some more detailed views later in the week but let me just say this as a basic entree to try to put this message in context and that doesn't need any strategic M&A experience to understand.

    For a company to be taken out the acquirer needs to get > 89.99% to trigger compulsory acquisition of the remaining minorities.

    Look at the combined CEO and Executive Chair shareholding in % terms. What is it ?

    Why would a company's say that it was a risk that it could be taken out prematurely before full value was realized IF the executive management team alone could block the compulsory acquisition threshold being reached ?

    It is pretty simple, think about it and the MO of the company promoting this as a 'risk' for investors.

    DYOR (legal, commercial and other)
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.