Now that I'm done disproving Johnny Shapiro's latest article I've decided to go back and look into the articles he has written about BIG.
The first article written in 2017 has this comment at the end of it:
"The lack of institutional share ownership means it's almost impossible for the sceptics to bet against the stock by shorting it, as no shares are available to borrow".
What do trading methods have to do with the company that he is reporting on? It's a very peculiar thing to mention shorting and then to follow up the article with two more that are obviously written with a negative undertone and no conclusive evidence. Almost impossible to short but not impossible given what we saw on Friday.
Very suspicious. I think some serious questions will be asked of this journalist if he continues this line of reporting.
BIG Price at posting:
$1.80 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held