Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nannyalia, page-11

First 11 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
ironbark222

6,356 Posts.

203

17/02/18

09:59

Post #: 31125208
Share

Originally posted by Director12 ↑

Reasonable?

Bunch of bloody crooked scumbags IMO. On Wed they snuck through the banksters bail-in legislation while most of the senate wasn't there. Should be illegal.

http://cecaust.com.au/main.asp?sub=bail-in&id=bail-in2017.html

"
Under siege from erupting public opposition, the Turnbull government whisked its APRA crisis resolution bill through the Senate and into law on 14 February. Of Australia’s 76 senators, only seven were present when the government rushed the bill to a vote, which passed “on the voices”, with no opposition from the Labor or Greens senators present. The process was hurried to ensure that senators who planned to move an amendment, to stipulate that the bill’s “bail-in” provisions must not apply to bank deposits, did not have the chance, and weren’t even present when it passed.
The passage of this bill was a live demonstration of the incredible power that banking interests wield over Australian politics. (Before it sold out to those banking interests and embraced neoliberal economics, the “old” Labor Party called them the “Money Power”.) This bill is going to backfire on the Money Power, however. In their desperation for a law that confiscates people’s savings to prop up too-big-to-fail (TBTF) banks, they have further fuelled the revolt in the population against banks and the political elites who serve them.
Dirty trick
The biggest scandal about the bill’s rushed passage, is the dirty trick the government pulled at the last moment to ensure it couldn’t be amended to explicitly protect deposits. A CEC delegation was in Parliament House this week meeting politicians from all parties, to expose the true nature of the bill. After having it explained to them, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party proposed an amendment to the bill to clarify that it wouldn’t include deposits, which was the government’s claim after all. In a meeting with the government on the morning of the Senate debate, One Nation notified government and Treasury representatives that they intended to move the amendment. The government offered to have their legal experts look at the wording of the amendment. However, it was while One Nation was waiting to hear back from the government’s legal experts that the bill was rushed through without their knowledge. Not only did One Nation not get to move their amendment, no One Nation senator was yet present in the chamber!"

Labour and liberal, just two heads on the same rotten snake.

Expand

Yes, the Senate should be illegal, get rid of it.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

PTX

This rare type of lymphoma ruins the body – so do existing treatments. Prescient could have a solution

WA8

Warriedar aims for Ricciardo MRE upgrade on 'thick, high-grade' gold and antimony

PSC

Prospect's Mumbezhi Project puts it at the middle of copper's megatrend. And FQM just bought in

ASX Market Close: Climbing to 8,700s based on vibes wasn't sustainable

First 11 Last