Ann: Response to ASX Query Letters, page-142

First 142 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Thanky

2,519 Posts.

237

23/02/18

13:58

Post #: 31291366
Share

Originally posted by Warnie ↑

Consequently, BRTV has not had to pay any Cancellation Fees to FC pursuant to the Agreement.

That's because BIG relies upon the number of new signups and deposits taken being a higher number than the number of SB's who don't take up the final deal on the other end.

Once the number of SB's that don't take up the deal is greater than the number of new onboard clients coming in, BIG will not only lose their upfront costs (to which has now been not only spent on their costs, but needs to be repaid) but will also incur a substantial fee in consideration.

They have managed so far to replace new clients with non accepting clients, but this is no way to run a business IMO.

BIG are certainly playing a risky game.

You need more and more coming in the front end to cover those leaving the backend.
Also, the cost (amount to be paid back or out) is far greater at the backend (client loss) than deposits $$ received per client at the front end.

Almost sounds like a .....oh I won't say it.

Lastly as per the FCC agreement:

Events of Default 28

The Agreement includes customary events of default including any change in the Control of BRTV, BRTV committing an offence under the Corporations Act 2001......

Depending on ASIC, If BIG are made to pay a fine for non disclosure, to which they have agreed to the offence in the Aware letter, then they have committed an offence under the Corporations Act 2001, technically could put the entire funds held by FC under dispute.

You could say the agreement is with BRTV and not BIG, and BIG committed the offence and not BRTV, anyway... views?

Expand

That's my reading of it including the last sentence would be the argument I would make if I was Big Un's board.

I'm still wrapping my head around it fully, but it is a high risk play by BIG. In someways I think it is very clever to build out an ecosystem of videos recycling working capital. But as a shareholder I didn't know I owned part of a company playing this game.

BIG Price at posting: $2.22 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
5 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

LRV

Larvotto identifies new exploration target at NSW's Hillgrove, boosting shares by nearly 20%

Wealth Within weighs in on shock 4% inflation read – and stocks that could survive the gloom

CMX

ChemX Materials kicks off first stage works at WA high purity alumina pilot

SVL

Silver Mines models five new calderas close to 396Moz Bowdens deposit

AVA

Ava Risk Group expands US presence with A$0.7M Substation Deal

3DP

Pointerra wins US$1.63M from US Dept of Energy to model climate change scenarios

RCE

Recce's R327 found effective against E.coli during clinical trial

LU7

Lithium Universe (ASX:LU7) board visits Quebec to engage key stakeholders

SS1

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

Microcap Wrap: 5 explorers with news out today

There are more pages in this discussion • 247 more messages in this thread...

First 142 Last

Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist

Ann: Response to ASX Query Letters, page-142

Top Stories

Larvotto identifies new exploration target at NSW's Hillgrove, boosting shares by nearly 20%

Wealth Within weighs in on shock 4% inflation read – and stocks that could survive the gloom

ChemX Materials kicks off first stage works at WA high purity alumina pilot

Silver Mines models five new calderas close to 396Moz Bowdens deposit

Ava Risk Group expands US presence with A$0.7M Substation Deal

Pointerra wins US$1.63M from US Dept of Energy to model climate change scenarios

Recce's R327 found effective against E.coli during clinical trial

Lithium Universe (ASX:LU7) board visits Quebec to engage key stakeholders

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

Microcap Wrap: 5 explorers with news out today

Featured News