After a lot of thinking today I think much of this analysis is incorrect, imo. It's a massive stream of consciousness. He should be posing questions rather than drawing conclusions. As I said IMO but readers beware of following the logic whole heartedly.
On the last point, why does BIG borrow money? So it didn't need to do a Capital Raise?
This is what you call great analysis, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 324 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)