Mr H, all,
I am no lawyer, but it's pretty clear to me
“The date on which the Request is received by the
Secretariat shall, for all purposes, be deemed to be
the date of the commencement of the arbitration.”
Also, you cannot delay this by dragging out on a choice of arbitrators.
As per your post above
“Where the dispute is to be referred to three arbitrators, the third arbitrator, who will act as president of the arbitral tribunal, shall be appointed by the Court, unless the parties have agreed upon another procedure for such appointment, in which case the nomination will be subject to confirmation pursuant to Article 13. Should such procedure not result in a nomination within 30 days from the confirmation or appointment of the co-arbitrators or any other time limit agreed by the parties or fixed by the Court, the third arbitrator shall be appointed by the Court”
And also
“Where the parties have not agreed upon the number of arbitrators, the Court shall appoint a sole arbitrator, save where it appears to the Court that the dispute is such as to warrant the appointment of three arbitrators. In such case, the claimant shall nominate an arbitrator within a period of 15 days from the receipt of the notification of the decision of the Court, and the respondent shall nominate an arbitrator within a period of 15 days from the receipt of the notification of the nomination made by the claimant. If a party fails to nominate an arbitrator, the appointment shall be made by the Court.”
The following is interesting, and that won’t have been too long after the selection of arbitrators surely.
“The time limit within which the arbitral tribunal must render its final award is six months. Such time limit shall start to run from the date of the last signature by the arbitral tribunal or by the parties of the Terms of Reference or, in the case of application of Article 23(3), the date of the notification to the arbitral tribunal by the Secretariat of the approval of the Terms of Reference by the Court. The Court may fix a different time limit based upon the procedural timetable established pursuant to Article 24(2).”
So is it QED then.
KKW
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FAR
- Conocophillips Arbitration update
Conocophillips Arbitration update, page-108
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
52.0¢ |
Change
0.015(2.97%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.05M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
50.5¢ | 52.0¢ | 50.5¢ | $17.38K | 33.92K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 51.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
52.0¢ | 96060 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 46081 | 0.505 |
2 | 70000 | 0.500 |
4 | 83693 | 0.495 |
1 | 5000 | 0.490 |
2 | 92553 | 0.470 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.520 | 96060 | 2 |
0.525 | 19005 | 2 |
0.530 | 1005 | 1 |
0.550 | 27285 | 2 |
0.555 | 10000 | 1 |
Last trade - 14.33pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FAR (ASX) Chart |