Ann: Amended - Massive Sulphide Mineralisation Drilled at Cangai, page-110

Mt88, I agree that it is a great intercept if it comes back with the grades you expect. Even so it is not a continuous zone of mineralisation, there are 8 metres of what one would presume is waste in that 30m interval.

However, my point in the post which caused the Visionary to become myopic is that:

- to achieve the inferred resource tonnes and grades (JORC) within the blue triangle I defined, every intercept has to be a good one - 20m at 4%Cu, 30m at 3%Cu etc. Not one of the intercepts in the release and within that zone came close if one calculates Cu grades using the CCZ sulphide percentage estimates and an assumption that 50% of the sulphides are chalcopyrite.

You guys reckon I'm a mug, a down-ramper whatever, but apart from one stuff-up with triangle area corrected by myself, can you deny the arithmetic?