The larger miners have shallow pit resources around the 1/gt average grade but they do have economy of scale. KAL will hopefully(speculation) end up closer to 2g/t which is great for a resource between 1Moz and 2Moz. So I see no problem at all.
It will benefit significantly with any improvement and drill results suggest we could hopefully see both an improvement in average grade and also increased total ounces, however that is speculative...a fact Sugbess fails to diclose when they say there will be no more ounces soon and no improvement to grade. How would they know this? they should diclose how they reach this conclusion. We are afterall waiting on results to signify if the company is headed towards an improved jorc resource, are we not? Do they already know the results? How? They just print lies as far as I can see.
grades, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add KAL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.151M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 376806 | 2.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6¢ | 30973 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.23am 26/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| KAL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable