What I have done consistently is to research the available evidence and present it factually with the implications as I see them. No I haven't been positive on everything OGX ...but I don't need to give any concessions in the case when the arguments are largely irrelevant. They are often a side show with voluminous facts -that no one else is remotely interested in. Take the Anglo debate ...who cares (besides Eshmun) -is it going to change how much gold is recovered in March? No! The reason it hasn't been mentioned recently is because it is currently not important to the management of OGX (If I was Anglo, I would want to be very confident that any investment decisions were not made on the basis of insider knowledge). But a lot of this crap (like questioning whether there may be a conflict of interest by Jeremy Gray) is simply a red-herring designed to obfuscate and confuse new investors.
What a spin doctor does is take facts or statements and manipulate, twist, misquote or misconstrue them to show a distorted meaning or emphasise an aspect consistent with their agenda. I appreciate your compliment, but is your forte'.
Let me give you some example of your subtle manipulations:
Manipulation 1. You misquoted me here:
I said: "Move on folks ...nothing to see here -paid off in three years and then its all ours ...OURS I TELL YOU!"
...and you misquoted me by saying: "Paid off in 3 years then it's all ours, ours I tell you..... not sure whether to chuckle or run SJB, sounding like a man smitten by gold fever."
Clearly removing the humour and changing the meaning.
Manipulation 2. You misquoted me here:
I said: "I can conceive of a Billion dollar market cap with the right drill intercepts and development over a few years..."
...and you misquoted me by saying: " ...so i think saying Ogx is heading towards a 1 billion market cap... Jesus, if that ain't upramping what is?".
Clearly I did not say "OGX is headed towards a billion dollars" -and I would appreciate it if you do not misquote me in future. I emphatically, clearly and succinctly was referring to Tintero and Elisio (not Cascavel alone) -so not only did you misquote me, but you took my comment out of context too.
I clearly understand the game of deception you are playing -and I ask you too cease.
Please, don't set yourself up as some independent arbiter judging between myself and Eshmun you also have a clear agenda but you are just pretending and trying to be more subtle.
I'm curious to know where you think our market cap might be headed in the event that further drilling uncovers widespread economic mineralisation. Or do you think that drill intercept CDP_021 WITH 17.56M OF silver @ 1,292.4 g/t is as good as it gets. Did we happen to drill into only spot where this incredible mineralisation exists?
Finally I'm pleased to see that you and Eshmun agree that AISC is all important. Later this evening I plan to post evidence showing that the high Cascavel AISC fear campaign you guys have waged is not based in fact.
No point posting about a single company and using it's irrelevant situation to scare OGX followers. I would have thought any company with an AISC above $2,000 will struggle .
More obfuscation -but you run with it if that's what you need to do -don't expect me to be quiet about it though.
Cheers,
SJB
OGX Price at posting:
12.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
.
