What is trying to be explained to you here is this proposed change of legislation will negatively impact many people who are, themselves, on very low incomes. So low that they either are on zero marginal tax or the first level of tax, viz 19%. If these people have had franking credits returned to them, under the new policy, they would effectively be paying 30% tax or 19% tax, dependent on their marginal tax rate. Hence, the poorest of the poor will be adversely (negatively) disadvantaged.
Now, are you suggesting these people should be disadvantaged, given they are the poorest of the poor, under the proposed Shorten plan. Once again, as I have suggested before, I doubt if you understand much of this at all JonnoH. Fortunately, you are not the majority on these forums,
