Yes and the law of defamation is notoriously difficult to defend against when material is available for prosecution . Unusually the onus is the defendant to prove that they have not instigated any level of defamation in their actions . In my view I see more evidence of defamation than insider trading .
Something doesn't add up ?, page-166
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 92 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)