However, that said, the 7:1 valuation ratio with Ardea should be a screaming anomaly for every person following this sector. All indicators are CLQ is the better project, their economics look better, especially in terms of scale and cost [to be confirmed by their upcoming DFS]. My own analysis concludes a 3.5:1 ratio is more rational, which to me means Ardea would need to double to realize a more reasonable relative valuation to CLQ. I expect ARRRF to hit 3 about the time CTEQF hits 2.
why clq is not a spec miner, page-4
Add SRL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
39.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.25%) |
Mkt cap ! $36.09M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 40.0¢ | 40.0¢ | 39.5¢ | $917 | 2.293K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13000 | 39.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 40.0¢ | 5522 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.55pm 08/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SRL (ASX) Chart |