WFL (ASX) Brainstorming Idea?

Originally posted by cmk1969 ↑

Hi iceman.11. As you know Hotcopper is a discussion forum and we are all entitled to voice our various opinions, including yourself. My post was in answer to a simple request from Lionheart for suggestions on perhaps how & where improvements can be made. My suggestion, among others from other Hotcopper contributors over the last decade+ have previously been put forward to the OBJ BoD and mostly fallen on deaf ears. In the past the BoD have struggled on quite a few fronts and that is exactly why changes are afoot. Yes, it's time to forgive the past and Steve will assist in this process, as will Revenue, which is the only asset that the Market in general seems to be looking for after all these years; but imo it is not the time to forget. We All need to remember that on the Revenue front, even money from the recent Olay additions including Olay Cellscience, Olay White Radiance ranges etc; these Revenues will take time to show up in OBJ's balance sheet.........they really only launched in April, which means the beginnings of these funds won't hit OBJ accounts until 45 days after 30/06/2018.........which means the September 4C. iceman.11, feel free to add to this thread/conversation with some constructive suggestions of your own and try not to get too hung up on thumbs up, as you can't control what others think of you or your posting style. Other peoples thoughts are really none of our business.

Expand

Hi cmk, I should have added this to my post yesterday but neglected to, I’ll say it and leave it at that.

One question I have asked MORE than once concerns the royalties in referance to sales of the kit with the wand in the longer term and IF any possible impact etc etc.

I am here to learn, I won’t learn or perhaps anybody else learn, if posters neglect to engage in meaningful dialogue on particular issues. I realise that without figures it would be hard to quantify accurate figures but I am still seeing NO attempt by anybody to even try or explain how my concern mightn’t be relevant.

LH, I was interested in a response from you, guess I AM repeating myself again ...lol, that’s fine, I would think at least I HAVE made a attempt to gain some clarity on my concerns and learn something new.

I think that there can be said to be a general consensus, perhaps largely unspoken off, that the previous BOD was ‘ineffective’, if that has basis to be correct, (I do think many posters may still not realise the enormity of the task the BOD had) then any ‘negativity’ by posters back then perhaps did have credence and was 100% justified.

Because we have a ‘new guard’ should not mean that we must remain entirely ‘postive’ blindly and not try to clarify any possible ‘negatives’.

Yes, we must ‘trust’ mangerment, though that trust will absolutely have to be justified in the future, not being ‘mindful’ of possible problems will again put us in a position where WE will not like to be in.

On a side note I am suprised, in hindsight, imo, that a group in the top twenty of Obj did not initiate action or done it sooner IF the ‘old guard’ was indeed that ‘ineffective’.

Cheers.