Your opinion entirely. Go back further in the post and you will see I mentioned all of their reports have no measurable outcomes, apart from murky feel good statements. As a person who prepares and reads these reports all the time that does not show good governance or stewardship of the funds. Your comment
"that This thread seems to be swimming in a sea of feelings with little insight into the actual operation of the Clinton Foundation and whether the way they disperse their operations is reasonable or not."
goes to the core of the problem, their reports don't give true insight into the operations or outcomes, and as an Australian taxpayer I want to know what are the outcomes of our government's hefty donations.
As for their asset holdings, they are a charity people who donate want their money spent on worthy recipients and looking at their balance sheet they have over $240m in cash or investments, obviously a lot of money is not where it should be.
