I have been tempted to provide a pro-Trinity perspective but then thought of the energy that may have to go into a pointless slanging match.
It's been a while now since I combed through numerous trinity essays, however I would be interested in you putting one up, with the following conditions.
1. No,,,,, as you say, no slinging match and in fact, you put it up, I'll address it, counter it, we can just look, comment if we wish, or not to.
2. The Greek must be allowed to be relied on and I'm only proposing the Greek Interlinear at this point in time, however, at times on their, the actual true meaning of some Greek words, will be checked, as some of the said English words above the Greek, at times are out of wack, so Strong's meanings, at least will be sort, as required.
3. If there is Weak interpretations with pretty much no support for implying, it's not on, as in Mr G's angel haha.
4. Now there is no point in supplying the like of these dribble claims, where Jesus answers the question, when asked if He is the likes of the Son and he says, I am and then going, see, see, he is the I AM. That would be a waste of time.
5. haha - Some points won't be short, as I will not and we cannot, have half the story, half truths, cheery pick.
Naturally, it wouldn't be an over righter.
Expand
